Archivi per la categoria ‘Varie’

Il PC? Un grosso telecomando:: senzavolto ::

martedì, 7 novembre 2006

Interessante e documentato l’articolo di Nicola Bruno (è di qualche giorno fa) sulla "wisdom of the few": molti fenomeni collettivi in Rete, quelli rappresentativi del web 2.0, sarebbero in realtà il prodotto di pochi utenti attivi ed influenti e una gran quantità di lurkers e group thinkers.

Vien da dire, un po’ le stesse proporzioni che ci sono tra chi la televisione la fa e chi la guarda?
Sul web, però, esiste la possibilità di interagire…

Questo post è creato a partire da una news originale di Stephen tramite il plugin WordPress Autoblog

The Big Question for November - Future of ISD / ADDIE / HPT?eLearning Technology

lunedì, 6 novembre 2006

November’s Big Question on the Learning Circuits Blog has been posted. The question this month is:

Are ISD / ADDIE / HPT relevant in a world of rapid elearning, faster time-to-performance, and informal learning?

To me, this is one of the most important questions facing us today. If you look at the shift between eLearning 1.0, 1.3 and 2.0 – and particularly the shift in who creates content, you’ll notice that the bulk of content creation moves from the learning function to SMEs or workers/learners.

I believe that we will continue to create linear learning experiences (courses, courseware) but that this is going to be a smaller portion of learning. As I’ve pointed to before: Course and Courseware are Fading - The Future of eLearning. What you have to ask yourself is:

What business are you in? Are you in the business of creating linear learning experiences? Courses and Courseware? If so, then you are the railroads of the future.

Instead, I think of our industry as being involved in the convergence of management consulting, human performance, learning and technology. Our job is to understand the business objectives, understand how human performance impacts them, identify the gaps and opportunities, etc.

My mental picture of what we do all the time I’ve shown before (Learning Design in a Nut Shell):

I personally believe that a lot of what we know about analyzing the business issues, human performance issues, information issues, human performance needs are similar today as they were 10 to 20 years ago. There are some new considerations such as greater audience distribution, less time with learners, alternate information sources, etc. And all of this affects the resulting blends. However, the analytic skills we use to understand how to impact human performance are more valuable today than ever.

What has changed is what we produce. At a minimum, we are creating much richer blends. This is probably the easiest change to understand and the easiest transition.

What is much more challenging is that as we look at eLearning 1.3 and 2.0, we change roles from direct content creation and control of delivery to a set-up, aggregator, guidance role. We also take responsibility for helping people “learn how to learn.” (Of course, it would be helpful if we all first became experts in learning how to learn ourselves - see Do Learning Professionals Make the Worst Learners?)

So, back to the question - are ISD / ADDIE / HPT relevant? My answer is a definite: Yes, but. And the "but" is that they will be marginalized unless you do the following:

  • Figure out Rapid HPT, ISD, ADDIE

    Even in the case of eLearning 1.0 solutions (where you create the content) we must become more agile in our models. I personally believe that everywhere in business we are being forced to make choices between fast and best. In software, having something tomorrow may be more important than having all the functionality and maybe not even thoroughly tested. Doing big market research studies may fall prey to just putting it out there and trying to sell it. We have to adapt to faster choices and the fact that we may not have found “the best” answer.Definitely look at Thiagi’s Rapid Instructional Design and One Week Course.

    I’ll leave it to Harold Stolovich, Allison Rossett, Ruth Clark and others to talk about how these models can be streamlined, but I would suggest that we all need to ask – how quickly can I get an 80% solution? What is the value of the last 20% vs. the time cost?

  • Increase the Breadth and Improve Your Understanding of New Models / Tools
  • We need to learn when and how to use eLearning 1.0, eLearning 1.3, eLearning 2.0 and other types of solutions.

  • Become Meta-learning Experts
  • We need to learn how to learn ourselves and find systems that support learning even when we don’t create the content. Then we need to be experts at teaching others how to use these systems and learn how to learn.

  • Learn to become guides, aggregators
  • Much of what we’ll be doing in the future is not creating content ahead of learning, but working alongside, realtime of our learning community helping them with content, helping them to become better learners, and looking at the content that is being created and improving it, providing structure or guides. It’s a radically different model, but I believe there’s still relevance in ISD/ADDIE/HPT for this as well.

Questo post è creato a partire da una news originale di Tony Karrer tramite il plugin WordPress Autoblog

Net-Snobbismo

lunedì, 6 novembre 2006

In un’intervista pubblicata nel supplemento libri di Repubblica di sabato scorso, Frederick Forsyth, il noto autore inglese di thriller, ha affermato di non usare Internet per le ricerche in quanto, a suo dire, vi si trovano “informazioni già note e spesso non accurate“. Forsyth precisa che se, ad esempio, avesse necessità di dettagli sullo smaltimento delle scorie nucleari, preferirebbe “passare mezza giornata con il più grande esperto inglese sull’argomento”.

Mi pare un mirabile esempio di snobbismo culturale: caro Forsyth, purtroppo noi comuni mortali non possiamo telefonare ai “più grandi esperti” nazionali e internazionali di ogni branca dello scibile, ogni volta che ci serve un’informazione!

Più modestamente, però, ci rivolgiamo spesso e volentieri a siti come Wikipedia, traendone generalmente informazioni utili e, spesso, molto accurate! Pensi un po’, parlano anche di lei!!!

technorati tags:,

Questo post è creato a partire da una news originale di antonio.fini tramite il plugin WordPress Autoblog

LMS VS Social software

domenica, 5 novembre 2006

Ma come dovrebbero essere strutturati i contenuti? A quali criteri devono rispondere? Il problema non è tanto rivolto ai contenuti in sè, ma al loro utilizzo, alle modalità di interazioni che l’utente può adottare:

Insofar as there is content, it is used rather than read

eLearn: Feature Article

E’ quindi la possibilità di utilizzare i materiali, adattandoli alle proprie esigenze, commentando e ri-creando i contenuti, che consente un esperienza significativa per l’utente. Di fronte a questa visuale cade la differenza tra Learning Object e Learning Application ( questa idea ha tra l’altro notevoli ripercussioni anche nel progettare Repository come LeeMill).

La chiave del successo di molti servizi 2.0 è proprio l’integrazione dei contenuti con modalità di interazioni innovative.

what is the distinction between a learning object and a learning application? What is the difference between the domain of content (and therefore content experts) and the domain of functionality (and therefore programming experts)? We contend that there is no clean separation of concerns.

eLearn: In Depth Tutorials

Servizi come Flickr e Delicious, possono avere ampie ripercussioni sulla didattica, piattaforme di blogging possono sostituire interi LMS, file RSS possono veicolari i contenuti di un intero corso.

E’ dunque finita, non ci sono più speranze per gli LMS?

Una interessante via di uscita potrebbero essere le mash up, applicazioni in grado di integrare i servizi offerti dai social software- vedi le numerose integrazioni di Delicious e Flickr-.

La vera sfida a questo punto si gioca sulla possibilità di rendere accesibile la programmazione di queste Mash up, abbattendo i costi di produzione. In questo processo gli strumenti di Authoring potrebbero giocare un ruolo chiave, abbandonando la semplice formattazione di Learning Object, ed estendedo le loro funzionalità verso le possibilità del web 2.0.

Messaggio originale di address-withheld@my.opera.com.invalid () e software di Elliott Back

Creare font personalizzatidownloadblog

sabato, 4 novembre 2006

Alzi la mano chi non ha mai pensato: "Cavolo, un font creato dalla mia calligrafia sarebbe davvero comodo!". Bene, MyfirstFont.com ci viene in aiuto. Grazie ad un dettagliatissimo tutorial (in inglese) verremo guidati passo passo nella creazione del nostro font con FontCreator (Trial di 30gg, 40$ se volete acquistarlo).

Dopo aver compilato e acquisito con lo scanner il template potremo testare e modificare il font a nostro piacimento. Una volta soddisfatti del lavoro fatto il file .ttf andrà copiato nella cartella fonts et voilà. Potremmo utilizzare la nostra calligrafia all’interno di qualsiasi software.

Troppa fatica? Windows XP ci viene in aiuto, con un software installato nel nostro Windows, ma di cui pochi sono a conoscenza. Il software, denominato “Editor di caratteri personalizzati” permette, con un’interfaccia simile a quella di Paint, di creare font salvabili e utilizzabili subito.

Come avviare il programma? Semplice: Start > Esegui > eudcedit

Questo post è creato a partire da una news originale di Napolux tramite il plugin WordPress Autoblog

Scrapbook

sabato, 4 novembre 2006

Come annotare un intero corso online: Scrapbook spiegato da Openlearn.

November 03, 2006

Annotating Local, Navigable Copies of OpenLearn ContentEarly this week I came across quite the most amazing Firefox extension I’ve seen for some time - Scrapbook. This extension lets you make a local (i.e. offline) copy of a site, and then do various nifty things with it - make personal annotations (or even shared ones if you have shared drive access), text highlighting, even search.

OUseful Info: Annotating Local, Navigable Copies of OpenLearn Content

Original post by address-withheld@my.opera.com.invalid () and software by Elliott Back

Firefox Ad

giovedì, 2 novembre 2006

Original post by address-withheld@my.opera.com.invalid () and software by Elliott Back

Masie’s Engage Learning 2006 PromosWord of Mouth Blog

martedì, 31 ottobre 2006

If you’re one of Elliott Masie’s 53,078 Learning Trends readers, or one of the 1,702 e-learning professionals heading to Learning 2006 next week, you’ve probably noticed something — Elliott is a fan of Articulate Engage and has leveraged the highly flexible FAQ interaction twice now.

First, Elliott used Engage to explore How Changing Technology Will Change Learning. In the last section of the lesson, Elliott says, "Some of you are going to say — ‘How did you do this and how long did it take?’ I was trying to walk the talk of a different approach. We’re using a brand new product that was just released — and I don’t endorse any products — but it’s called Engage from Articulate. I will tell you that this entire module took about an hour to create."

Last week, Elliott then used a "blended learning approach to (the) Learning 2006 Orientation" by sending a link to another Engage FAQ interaction — which includes a 17-minute introduction video — to all Learning 2006 attendees. Along with the audio and intro video, you’ll also see a number of links to online Learning 2006 resources throughout the interaction. It’s truly an interaction learning experience.

SNAG-1948.png

View Elliott’s Learning 2006 Orientation

View Elliott Masie’s Learning 2006 Engage interactions in the context of the Learning 2006 site:

Questo post è creato a partire da una news originale di gabe tramite il plugin WordPress Autoblog

Flock

lunedì, 30 ottobre 2006

Original post by address-withheld@my.opera.com.invalid () and software by Elliott Back

e-Learning and the ADDIE Model

lunedì, 30 ottobre 2006

Original post by mapik and software by Elliott Back